Если велосипед едет по проезжей части, то на него распространяются те же правила,что и для машин,включая правило правой руки.А при выезде на проезжую часть ситуация иная:
http://www.liikenneturva.fi/directo...ite%20suomi.pdf
На практике эти правила знают единицы,остальные делятся на 2 группы: кто думает,что у велосипеда ВСЕГДА преимущество,и кто думает,что преимущества у более сильного,т.е.машины.В результате едешь и пытаешься по глазам определить,к какой группе относится приближающееся ТС
Вот очень похожая история:
==
Let me share a story which happened to me this year. It may be
instructive for people who did not yet have experience like this.
Back in February, I was cycling to work (as I do every day). Going by a
dedicated bike lane, I saw a car driving out of the yard to the main
street. The car stopped before the bike lane, as it should. I continued
my way; but the driver pressed the pedal right when I was approaching.
As a result, I was hit by the front of the car, flew on to the hood and
then ahead on the ground.
Miraculously, I was not hurt at all; also, there was no car on the
street which would run over me. I called the police immediately.
The driver, man in fifties, behaved as a normal person would in such
situation, i.e. was looking scared, asking me weather I am fine, etc.
I thought that anyone can do a mistake like this, not look to the
bike lane -- although I had very bright clothes and the street was
otherwise clean. I decided that I'll not raise any claims, because,
it was hard to believe, but after my flight I had not even got bruised
and my bicycle had just minor scratches.
When the police arrived, they asked if anyone has any claims. We both
said "no". Policeman said that in such case there will be no
investigation on this case, and they just have to fill papers for the
driver's insurance (the hood of the car was scratched and somewhat
punched). After I got the confirmation that "you don't need to do
anything here", I continued my way to work.
Next day I received a call from the police. A crime report has been
filed against me for a traffic violation. When I went to the police to
make my own statement, I read that the driver wrote that the car was
standing, and I hit it approaching from the side. He was as unselfish
as to request from me "just fixing the damage or paying for it". I made
my own statement explaining my view of the situation, attaching medical
sertificate (stating that I have scratched a knee -- that was it!)
and a paper from the bike shop, which evaluated my damage.
It took about 2 months for the case to get out of the police. There
was "esitutkimus" (pre-investigation), which ended up photographing
the place of the accident. Then it took another 2 months for the
district attorney to send the refusal to raise the case to the court.
Now the lawer whom I was talking to does not recommend me to raise
the case by my own, motivating it, to put it straight, "you'll pay
me more than you get in the court" (although my damage claim is
approaching 4 digit numbers). Of course I still feel sad about this
case by obvious reasons and I'll still consider the option to
take the case to the court. This was my first accident during many
years of cycling and first time I was mistreated by a Finn during
more than 5 years in Finland.
Lessons I got from this case:
1. Always call the police in case of even lightest accident. If you
think that is not needed -- the other party may wait until you leave
and then say that you escaped the scene.
2. Request the police to make a report with measurements and
photographs. I have not done this, and now I don't have a bullet proof
that it was not me who ran into the standing car. The driver certainly
already repaired the dents, which would clearly show the opposite,
and the police did not take the trouble of checking and documenting
them.
3. Don't get nervous because "nothing happens". It takes 2 months
to send a paper from one instance to another.
Wishing you accident-free life,
Konstantin.
